|
Social Audit... Research Findings - Transport Infrastructure |
||||||||||||
|
Congestion back return to top of page Speeding
cars and car parking were ranked third and fourth respectively in
residents identification of big
environmental problems in their area. However, the community “Traffic
coming up the valley causing bottle-neck from Maindy to Parc &
Dare between 4 and 6pm daily” “traffic
in Treorchy is terrible between 4 and 6 p.m.” “traffic
is getting worse” In
turn this is reported to have created problems in the side streets
which run parallel to the main road with drivers trying to escape
the congestion by using these as rat runs: “they
turn in by the Red Cow and turn out by the Prince……it’s a
rat run” “we
need traffic calming measures to stop speeding ….Dumfries Street
is a rat run” Respondents
suggested a range of different ways which might help alleviate
these problems. These included incremental adjustments to traffic
management on the existing road infrastructure: “traffic
congestion at Stag Square -turn off lights as a trial …place
roundabout instead of lights……when the lights are not working
the traffic just flows through” “more
traffic control by post office ….no right turn away from the
side roads” However,
many respondents also appeared to take the view that more radical
measures be taken in the form of constructing a new bypass: “build
a bypass which takes the Cwmparc traffic out of Treorchy” “take
part of the gardens and low cost [now
Pioneer] away and widen the road out …..” “Bypass
by EMI [on
the Treorchy Industrial Estate]upwards would take the traffic
up to Cwmparc - the existing road needs to be widened” “a
bypass is needed for the Rhondda” Significantly,
many respondents regarded the construction of a new by-pass as
something which was more than a quality of life issue, but as
being crucial to revitalising the local economy: “big
juggernauts on this road is pathetic. They can’t build factories
without good roads” “the
new by-pass for starters….communications are key ….. that
would create possibilities up here” Speeding back return to top of page Over
half (58%) of respondents to the questionnaire survey felt that
speeding cars were a big problem in their area. Qualitative
data relating to speeding cars suggests that this is principally a
problem on the main arterial routes through Treorchy, Ynyswen and
Cwmparc, although it has also been suggested that speeding is a
problem on those roads that are used as ‘rat runs’. Public
concern about speeding appeared greatest around areas such as
schools, parks, play grounds and residential streets where
children were playing or travelling as pedestrians. In these
locations there was popular support for the installation of
traffic calming measures such as speed cameras, speed bumps and
chicanes: “there
is a problem with speeding traffic …put in sleeping policemen” “a
speed camera on the main road is badly needed” “a
pedestrian crossing in the middle of Park Road would be much safer
for the young people of Cwmparc” “we
need calming measures …..sleeping policemen on either side of
the school” Parking back return to top of page Problems
with car parking appear to fall into two main types. The problem
associated with parking near shops and local services and the
problems which this generates for local businesses and their
customers: “parking
is problematic …..it stops shops opening up in the area” “there
is a problem of space for a car park….There is lots of talk but
no action” “car
parking around the library ……. I would like a car park on the
River Road” “We
need the opportunity to buy land for parking ……any shop owner
who tries to open in Treorchy … the first thing they throw at
you is parking” “
a car park behind the community centre [in Cwmparc] would be a
good idea as cars are always double parked on Park Road” “Parking
on school hill is causing danger to children as there is no
guidance for children crossing from school ….. also Pengelli
crossing” The
second major area of complaint with car parking is in residential
side streets where there are often not enough spaces to park. This
is especially the case since many households have more than one
car (the 2001 census found that 20.3% of households in Treorchy
had two or more cars or vans). Moreover there were also complaints
about cars parked near junctions with other roads causing
obstructions to larger vehicles such as buses (see below) or
delivery vehicles: “we
need double yellow lines for forty five feet around
junctions….the lack of them impedes access” Additionally some respondents also commented that parking -
especially near junctions - was a road safety issue as it obscured
drivers vision, whilst some of the older respondents noted how in
their youth when car ownership was almost unknown the street had
been somewhere where they could play! The problems with parking
are in this way linked to the problems of a lack of suitable play
areas for children. Conclusion 11: There are clearly serious problems with the road traffic
infrastructure in the area. Congestion, especially on the main
arterial routes, has a negative impact on residents quality of
life, detracts from the attractiveness of Treorchy town centre as
a shopping area, increases residents travel to work times for
those working outside of the area and is also likely to discourage
inward investment. These problems are compounded by parking
difficulties in residential streets and around local amenities,
whilst there are also road safety fears created by speeding
traffic. Recommendation 9: The problems with the road infrastructure are again structural
and therefore beyond the control of the regeneration group.
However, the group should lend its support to other groups
campaigning for a bypass. In the near term it may be possible to
develop partnership arrangements with the local police force and
highways department with a view to implementing traffic calming
and control measures. The precise implementation of these measures
should be conducted through a process of ongoing consultation with
the community. Public transport back return to top of page Given that according to the 2001 census approximately one third (34%) of respondents did not have access to private/public transport provision is obviously of critical importance. This issue generated mixed and at times contradictory results. Thus, although an overall majority (63%) of respondents to the questionnaire survey claimed to be satisfied with the provision of public transport in the area approximately half (49%) of all respondents wanted to see improvements made to local bus services. Equally as can be seen from table 12, views about the adequacy of public transport were subject to significant variation across the three areas. Respondents from Cwmparc expressed far lower levels of satisfaction with the provision of public transport with only 56% describing it as excellent, good or satisfactory, and were also more likely to want improvements to the local bus service (61% compared to 52% of the total sample). This is likely
to have occurred as result of Cwmparc’s relative geographical
isolation and lack of local services generating a greater reliance
on public transport than is the case in Treorchy and Ynyswen
Perhaps surprisingly there was no significant variation in
views about the adequacy of public transport between those who had
access to private transport and those that did not.
Table
12: Proportion of respondents describing public transport
provision as excellent, good or acceptable.
Qualitative
aspects of the research recorded a number of key areas of
criticism with the local bus service. At times it was claimed that
the buses could be unreliable:
“the
buses are useless. My father waited for over an hour the other day
and a bus didn’t turn up so he went home.” “the
bus service doesn’t turn up some days” Some
respondents attributed this to unrealistic timetabling: “the
bus service doesn’t turn up some days ..there are problems with
drivers and the timetable …. It is supposed to run from Cwmparc
at 8.15 to Ponty to Rhydyfelen and get back to the Parc and Dare
at 9.30 a.m. ……..it often doesn’t make it” (As
is noted in an earlier section of this report during peak traffic
times this journey can take upwards of 40 minutes one way by car).
Further problems with timetabling reportedly arose through a lack
of co-ordination for journeys which required the use of more than
one bus: “To
go swimming they have to catch two buses and the cost is a lot
….. especially if you have two or three children. The times of
the buses don’t correspond” “Transport
is an issue …there are no facilities to get from valley to
valley…bus services do not tie in with them.” Other
respondents were critical about what they perceived as holes in
the timetable at crucial times. This was particularly the case
with the afternoon timetable in Cwmparc: “during
the afternoons from 2.30 to 4.30 there is no bus …its
inconvenient for shoppers” Finally
a number of respondents reported that there was something of a
lottery in whether the bus would actually be able to get round all
of its route as a result of the access difficulties created
through parking in residential streets and, during the winter, a
combination of bad weather and difficult roads. This can obviously
create major problems for people with mobility difficulties and
some reported that rather than “risk it” they would stay at
home if the weather was bad. However, it was also noted that
whether the bus would be able to successfully navigate its route
when conditions were difficult was largely dependent on the
attitude, willingness and skill of the driver. In this context it
was suggested that the service to residents could be improved
through the use of dedicated
drivers for particular routes. Conclusion 12: There is a clear view that local public transport services can
be improved. The main areas of concern relate to a perceived
unreliability of the bus service and a perceived lack of
co-ordination in timetabling for journeys requiring two or more
buses. Satisfaction levels with the local bus service are at their
lowest in Cwmparc. Clearly,
this discussion has major importance for the current community
transport feasibility study currently being conducted. Community
transport schemes have the capacity to address many of the local
and short route transport issues raised in the community audit.
They can used to provide both routine local services and to take
specific groups such as pensioners or youth to facilities outside
the immediate area. They have an added advantage of building the
local volunteer base and can provide training and employment
opportunities for local people. Recommendation
10 That
the Regeneration group supports the creation of a community
transport scheme and contributes to a positive outcome for the
current feasibility study. *
* * * * |
||||||||||||
|
please send your news items to - news@Treorchy.net Treorchy.net aims to provide you with an accurate news section - if you find a factual error, please let us know! |