|
Social Audit... Research Findings - Community and Place |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2.2. 2.2 Active Community The
South Wales Valleys are renowned for their close knit social structure and
highly developed sense of community. These images of valleys life have
been confirmed by the findings of previous survey based research projects,
which have found high levels of routine community association in terms of
reported behaviour and residents perceptions of the local sense of
community. These findings are replicated within this study.
As can be seen in Table 4, the questionnaire survey
recorded high levels of satisfaction with both the place and about the
sense of community. Although satisfaction levels were somewhat lower in
Ynyswen, it was still the case that three quarters of the population
described their area and the local sense of community as either excellent,
good or acceptable. Table
4: Respondents describing community or place as Excellent, Good, or
Acceptable.
Similarly,
as can be seen in Table 5, in all three areas respondents were most likely
to identify the close knit social structure that is fundamental to Valleys
communities as the thing that they liked best about their area. However,
the survey results again demonstrates the distinctiveness of each of the
three areas. For example, nearly four in ten respondents from Cwmparc
identified local social networks as the thing they liked best about their
area (compared to around three in ten respondents in the other areas).
Equally, the status of Treorchy as a local urban centre is reflected in
the high proportion of respondents from this area who identified local
services and amenities as the thing they liked best about their area (29%
compared to only 8% in Cwmparc). Table
5: What do you like best about your area as a place to live (%)
Furthermore,
respondents were asked to identify if they were members of community
organisations, clubs or activities. Here 27% identified themselves as
members compared to an estimated 23% for the wider RCT area. This
demonstrates a high level of community participation and membership of
local organisations and suggests the existence of an active community. Conclusion 1: Results from the questionnaire survey demonstrate a strong attachment
to place and a highly developed sense of community amongst residents of
Cwmparc, Treorchy and Ynyswen. This is consistent with the findings of
previous surveys conducted in the Rhondda Valleys and is a major asset for
any programme of regeneration. However,
the survival of community cohesions and attachment cannot be taken for
granted and there is a sense of declining community values in previous
studies of the Rhondda. Recommendation 1. The Regeneration Group should take every opportunity to promote
community activity and volunteering opportunities. There
is significant international evidence that the level of ‘social
capital’, the term given to
community relationships and cohesion,
has a significant affect on community regeneration and wealth
creation. Promotion of social capital is often best achieved by providing
informal and unstructured contacts and processes within the community
especially across the generational divide. Providing opportunities for
people of different ages to mingle and mix does much to raise trust levels
and defeat suspicion founded on lack of personal contact across the
generational divide. School projects which link children and older
community members have been particularly successful. There is evidence
that structured process such as committees and management groups
discourage community involvement. Despite
recognising the positive community influences in the locality, a key
emphasis of a social audit will inevitably be upon what residents perceive
as the negative and problematic aspects of life in their community. In
this vein the questionnaire survey included an open question which asked
respondents what they believed to be the three biggest problems affecting
their community. The results of this question are presented in Table 6
which shows the percentage of responses to different issues and ranks
these different issues according to how they have been prioritised by
respondents. This ranking
system is used as the basis for the structure of the remainder of this
report. Table
6: Respondents Identification of the
“Biggest Problems” Affecting Their Area.
*
* * * * |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
please send your news items to - news@Treorchy.net Treorchy.net aims to provide you with an accurate news section - if you find a factual error, please let us know! |